Harry potter books and films
Harry Potter: Books vs. Movies | The ArtificeIt is requested that this article, or a section of this article, should be expanded. Please help the Harry Potter Wiki by expanding this article to give more complete coverage of its subject. Below are a list of changes made to the stories of the Harry Potter books when they were adapted into feature films. Peeves , as depicted in concept art for the film adaptation of Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone. Some notable differences exist between key cast members of the film, compared to the way their characters are described in the books:.
HARRY POTTER BOOKS AND MOVIES - RANKED
List of differences between the Harry Potter books and films
Harry Potter is a British-American film series based on the eponymous novels by author J. The series is distributed by Warner Bros. Production took place over ten years, with the main story arc following Harry Potter's quest to overcome his arch-enemy Lord Voldemort. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows , the seventh and final novel in the series, was adapted into two feature-length parts. Late in , film producer David Heyman's London offices received a copy of the first book in what would become Rowling's series of seven Harry Potter novels.
The Harry Potter Series has undoubtedly changed the entire world over the past 20 years. Ever since Joanne Rowling best known as J. Rowling brilliantly published it serious Scholastic Inc. Harry Potter, Hermione Granger, and Ronald Weasley are the main protagonists we follow throughout the epic tale. As an avid reader of the Harry Potter Series I have read all of them more than three times now and proud , one can see many differences between reading the story and watching it unfold in film.
The actors delivered legendary performances, and the fact that Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint were at the center of the project until the very end was sheer perfection. Still, when it comes down to it, the movies are best as a complement to the books, rather than a replacement. Because the plain truth is… the books are better. People who only watch the movies are missing so much of the experience that is this wonderful series. Screenwriters, directors, and editors have to change a lot to take a story from the page to the screen, and plenty gets lost in translation. Sure, the movies have their moments of comic relief, but all in all, Rowling's books are way funnier. Fred and George get way more time to shine, and in general there's a lot of British wit that gets lost when the story is translated to screen.